Monday, May 17, 2010

The Brown Lady of Raynham Hall (Busted?)

When I was a kid, I loved books about "true" ghost stories, even though they freaked me out.  Two stories were extra scary.  One was about a zombie-looking ghost of a murdered woman who appeared in a junk shop basement.  The other tale was famous- The Brown Lady of Raynham hall.
Raynham Hall was built in Norfolk, U.K. in the 1600s (It's still here today).  According to the legend, by the 1800s, visitors sometimes spotted a ghostly lady in brown brocade (sometimes satin) dress.   She'd show up at the bedside or in the hallway, carrying a lamp and "grinning diabolically."   And some said she had "gouged out" eyes!   That was scary enough for me, but there was more- the ghost books had a photograph of her!
Here the photo:
It's an icon of ghostlore.   I took it seriously when I was a kid.  It gave me nightmares!
As an adult more suspicious.
I don't believe in ghosts, but assuming I'm wrong, this serene figure looks nothing like the menacing, disheveled specter from the legend.
A few have noticed the shape looks something like a Madonna statue.   Could it be a double exposure?  Had the  photographers snapped a picture of the former, then captured the staircase on the same plate?
I tried to recreate the process.
First I found an internet photo of a Madonna.  Here's one from a church (also in Norfolk, but 40+ miles away from Raynham Hall):


I digitally cut out the figure, turned it black and white, blurred it a bit and superimposed it  into the famous photo:


Hey!  It fits.
Here's another version, with the Madonna scooted off to the right:

Look familiar?  They look like near duplicates, with the "ghost" facing a a slightly different direction.   I bet the photographer was pulling a fast one using a similar statue.  What do you think?


13 comments:

  1. wonderful post. we used to go to Pawley's Island in South Carolina for a week each summer where there was the Gray Lady story which scared me so much- she always appeared right before the hurricane- to police officers etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How cool that you figured that out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. stray2:36 PM

    I'm susceptible to stories of visions of Mary, so I just can't be sure.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sally,
    Tell me more about the Gray Lady. (Funny how so many legendary ghosts are female- I wonder if it's like that in other cultures?)

    Hi Pile Girl,
    Thanks!
    Actually I'm not the first person who thought- wait a sec- that looks like a Madonna statue! but I've never seen one composited next to the original image before.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When I went to Stray's art show in Knoxville last year, I stayed in an old hotel on Market Square Mall. I caught a glimpse of the Chartreuse Lady coming out of the elevator late that night.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Chartreuse Lady, Linda?
    A ghost that tint might be your patron spirit.

    A group of lady ghosts, (The Gray Lady, The Red Lady, etc..) would be a good jumping point for a story or a cartoon. Maybe they haunt the same place and band together to fight bad guys. Or maybe it's a reality show- but I guess it wouldn't be called "Survivor"

    ReplyDelete
  7. stray5:35 AM

    Linda: was there a real live chartreuse lady?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Namo, you are funnnnnnny. Stray, all right, it was I. When I got out of the elevator, I caught a reflection of myself in the mirror and jumped. But that place was spooky.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "I caught a reflection of myself in the mirror and jumped."

    I've done that a more than a few times (my reflection, not your reflection)

    ReplyDelete
  10. stray4:32 AM

    That place was spooky! I heard it's up for sale. I remember now the sick green....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous9:29 PM

    >I digitally cut out the figure, turned it black and white, blurred it a bit and superimposed it
    >digitally
    Yeah, right...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:00 PM

    but it is an old picture. ur method is quite new. by the not a believer myself. i just think it is just aa illusion.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous7:58 AM

    The original photo dated 1936 has been analyzed and found to be untouched in any way. The negative also shows the image . It has been proven to be authentic. Just thought you should know.

    ReplyDelete

I dislike typing the quasi-legible words too, but without them it's Spam City, Sorry!